Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)Seedream 4.5Seedream 5.0 Lite
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)
    Quality
    36.9
    Rank
    #22/38
    Price
    $0.10/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Seedream 5.0 Lite: +2.2 quality · 2.9× price

  • Seedream 4.5
    Quality
    34.6
    Rank
    #24/38
    Price
    $0.040/img
    Speed
    11s

    vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality): −2.3 quality · 0.4× price

  • Seedream 5.0 Lite
    Quality
    34.7
    Rank
    #23/38
    Price
    $0.035/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality): −2.2 quality · 0.35× price

Overview

Lab
Ideogram
ByteDance Seed
ByteDance Seed
Released
Jun 3, 2026
Dec 5, 2025
Feb 13, 2026
Weights
Open
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.10
$0.040
$0.035Best
Time per image
—
11s
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

36.9±4.3Best
#22/38Verified
34.6±3.2
#24/38Verified
34.7±3.2
#23/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.