Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)Luma UNI 1.1Luma UNI 1 Max
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)
    Quality
    36.9
    Rank
    #22/38
    Price
    $0.10/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Luma UNI 1.1: −5.2 quality · 2.5× price

  • Luma UNI 1.1
    Quality
    42.1
    Rank
    #20/38
    Price
    $0.040/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Luma UNI 1 Max: +1.1 quality · 0.4× price

  • Luma UNI 1 Max
    Quality
    41.0
    Rank
    #21/38
    Price
    $0.10/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Luma UNI 1.1: −1.1 quality · 2.5× price

Overview

Lab
Ideogram
Luma AI
Luma AI
Released
Jun 3, 2026
May 5, 2026
May 5, 2026
Weights
Open
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.10
$0.040Best
$0.10

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

36.9±4.3
#22/38Verified
42.1±8.2Best
#20/38Verified
41.0±3.2
#21/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.