Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Ideogram 4.5Qwen-Image-3.0Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 38 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, Nano Banana 2.1, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 2 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1, Ideogram 4.5.

2 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1, Ideogram 4.5

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories

Overview

Lab
Ideogram
Alibaba Qwen
Google DeepMind
Released
Sep 30, 2026
Jul 21, 2026
Jun 30, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
—
$0.030Best
$0.034
Time per image
—
6.2s
3.1sBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

48.7±7.0
#20/41Verified
48.8±4.3Best
#19/41Verified
48.2±3.2
#21/41Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.