Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
HunyuanImage 3.5 PreviewLuma UNI 1.1Luma UNI 1 Max
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 36 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • HunyuanImage 3.5 Preview
    Quality
    39.7
    Rank
    #21/39
    Price
    $0.024/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Luma UNI 1 Max: −1.2 quality · 0.24× price

  • Luma UNI 1.1
    Quality
    38.6
    Rank
    #22/39
    Price
    $0.040/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Luma UNI 1 Max: −2.3 quality · 0.4× price

  • Luma UNI 1 Max
    Quality
    40.9
    Rank
    #20/39
    Price
    $0.10/img
    Speed
    —

    vs HunyuanImage 3.5 Preview: +1.2 quality · 4.2× price

Overview

Lab
Tencent Hunyuan
Luma AI
Luma AI
Released
Sep 22, 2026
May 5, 2026
May 5, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.024Best
$0.040
$0.10

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

39.7±4.3
#21/39Verified
38.6±4.4
#22/39Verified
40.9±3.2Best
#20/39Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.