Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
HiDream-O1-ImageFLUX.2 [dev]FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • HiDream-O1-Image
    Quality
    24.1
    Rank
    #34/38
    Price
    $0.040/img
    Speed
    7.3s

    vs FLUX.2 [dev]: −2.4 quality · 3.3× price

  • FLUX.2 [dev]
    Quality
    26.5
    Rank
    #33/38
    Price
    $0.012/img
    Speed
    16s

    vs HiDream-O1-Image: +2.4 quality · 0.3× price

  • FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
    Quality
    20.0
    Rank
    #35/38
    Price
    $0.015/img
    Speed
    4.0s

    vs FLUX.2 [dev]: −6.5 quality · 1.3× price

Overview

Lab
HiDream.ai
Black Forest Labs
Black Forest Labs
Released
May 8, 2026
Nov 25, 2025
Jan 15, 2026
Weights
Open
Open
Open
Price per image
$0.040
$0.012Best
$0.015
Time per image
7.3s
16s
4.0sBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

24.1±3.3
#34/38Mixed
26.5±3.2Best
#33/38Verified
20.0±3.2
#35/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.