Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
HiDream-O1-Edit-1.5Qwen-Image-2.1Qwen-Image-3.0
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • HiDream-O1-Edit-1.5
    Quality
    49.5
    Rank
    #17/38
    Price
    $0.10/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Qwen-Image-2.1: −1.1 quality · price n/a

  • Qwen-Image-2.1
    Quality
    50.6
    Rank
    #16/38
    Price
    —
    Speed
    —

    vs HiDream-O1-Edit-1.5: +1.1 quality · price n/a

  • Qwen-Image-3.0
    Quality
    48.1
    Rank
    #18/38
    Price
    $0.030/img
    Speed
    6.2s

    vs Qwen-Image-2.1: −2.5 quality · price n/a

Overview

Lab
HiDream.ai
Alibaba Qwen
Alibaba Qwen
Released
Aug 19, 2026
Sep 20, 2026
Jul 21, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Open
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.10
—
$0.030Best
Time per image
—
—
6.2s

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

49.5±8.2
#17/38Verified
50.6±4.3Best
#16/38Verified
48.1±4.3
#18/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.