Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Grok Imagine Image 2.0MAI-Image-2.6-FlashMuse Image
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Grok Imagine Image 2.0
    Quality
    70.7
    Rank
    #5/38
    Price
    $0.060/img
    Speed
    —

    vs MAI-Image-2.6-Flash: +5.0 quality · 3.1× price

  • MAI-Image-2.6-Flash
    Quality
    65.7
    Rank
    #6/38
    Price
    $0.019/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Grok Imagine Image 2.0: −5.0 quality · 0.33× price

  • Muse Image
    Quality
    63.8
    Rank
    #7/38
    Price
    $0.010/img
    Speed
    14s

    vs Grok Imagine Image 2.0: −6.8 quality · 0.17× price

Overview

Lab
SpaceXAI (xAI)
Microsoft AI
Meta
Released
Aug 7, 2026
Sep 4, 2026
Jul 7, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.060
$0.019
$0.010Best
Time per image
—
—
14s

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

70.6±3.2Best
#5/38Verified
65.6±4.3
#6/38Verifiedbest value
63.8±3.2
#7/38Verifiedbest value

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.