Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
FLUX.2 [pro]Ming-Image-0.1-DesignRecraft V4.1
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • FLUX.2 [pro]
    Quality
    28.5
    Rank
    #30/38
    Price
    $0.030/img
    Speed
    12s

    vs Ming-Image-0.1-Design: −1.1 quality · 1× price

  • Ming-Image-0.1-Design
    Quality
    29.6
    Rank
    #29/38
    Price
    $0.030/img
    Speed
    —

    vs FLUX.2 [pro]: +1.1 quality · 1× price

  • Recraft V4.1
    Quality
    28.0
    Rank
    #31/38
    Price
    $0.035/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Ming-Image-0.1-Design: −1.5 quality · 1.2× price

Overview

Lab
Black Forest Labs
inclusionAI (Ant Group)
Recraft
Released
Nov 25, 2025
Sep 22, 2026
May 14, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Open
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.030Best
$0.030Best
$0.035
Time per image
12s
—
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

28.5±3.2
#30/38Verified
29.6±5.6Best
#29/38Verified
28.0±5.6
#31/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.