Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
FLUX.2 [max]Seedream 4.5Seedream 5.0 Lite
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • FLUX.2 [max]
    Quality
    30.3
    Rank
    #25/38
    Price
    $0.070/img
    Speed
    30s

    vs Seedream 5.0 Lite: −4.4 quality · 2× price

  • Seedream 4.5
    Quality
    34.6
    Rank
    #24/38
    Price
    $0.040/img
    Speed
    11s

    vs Seedream 5.0 Lite: −0.1 quality · 1.1× price

  • Seedream 5.0 Lite
    Quality
    34.7
    Rank
    #23/38
    Price
    $0.035/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Seedream 4.5: +0.1 quality · 0.88× price

Overview

Lab
Black Forest Labs
ByteDance Seed
ByteDance Seed
Released
Dec 16, 2025
Dec 5, 2025
Feb 13, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.070
$0.040
$0.035Best
Time per image
30s
11sBest
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

30.3±3.2
#25/38Verified
34.6±3.2
#24/38Verified
34.7±3.2Best
#23/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.