Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Bach-1.0 PreviewVidu Q3 ProVeo 3.1
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 31 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Hailuo 2.3, Grok Imagine Video, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash. 4 models are not plotted: Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step.

4 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Bach-1.0 Preview
    Quality
    45.8
    Rank
    #20/34
    Price
    —
    Speed
    —

    vs Vidu Q3 Pro: −0.6 quality · price n/a

  • Vidu Q3 Pro
    Quality
    46.5
    Rank
    #19/34
    Price
    $0.16/s
    Speed
    132s

    vs Bach-1.0 Preview: +0.6 quality · price n/a

  • Veo 3.1
    Quality
    45.6
    Rank
    #21/34
    Price
    $0.40/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Vidu Q3 Pro: −0.9 quality · 2.5× price

Overview

Lab
Video Rebirth
Vidu (ShengShu)
Google DeepMind
Released
May 7, 2026
Jan 30, 2026
Jan 30, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
—
$0.16Best
$0.40
Render time
per clip
—
132s
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

45.8±7.8
#20/34Verified
46.5±3.2Best
#19/34Verified
45.6±3.0
#21/34Verified

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—
—