Skip to content
Model Pareto

Wan 3.0 vs HiDream-O1-Video

In video generation, Wan 3.0 scores 91.2 and HiDream-O1-Video 88.7 on the 0–100 quality scale. Wan 3.0 costs 2.1× as much as HiDream-O1-Video ($0.20 vs $0.097 per second of 1080p video).
Wan 3.0HiDream-O1-Video
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 36 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Boreal, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite, Agnes-Video-2.5, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash. 4 models are not plotted: Vidu Q4 Preview, Muse Video, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step, MAGI-2 Preview.

4 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Vidu Q4 Preview, Muse Video, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step, MAGI-2 Preview

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Wan 3.0
    Quality
    91.2
    Rank
    #2/38
    Price
    $0.20/s
    Speed
    —

    vs HiDream-O1-Video: +2.5 quality · 2.1× price

  • HiDream-O1-Video
    Quality
    88.7
    Rank
    #5/38
    Price
    $0.097/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Wan 3.0: −2.5 quality · 0.48× price

Overview

Lab
Alibaba Qwen
HiDream.ai
Released
Aug 19, 2026
Sep 17, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
$0.20
$0.097Best

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

91.2±4.1Best
#2/38Verified
88.7±7.0
#5/38Verifiedbest value

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—