Skip to content
Model Pareto

Wan 3.0 vs Gemini Omni Flash

In video generation, Wan 3.0 scores 93.1 and Gemini Omni Flash 92.9 on the 0–100 quality scale. Wan 3.0 costs 2× as much as Gemini Omni Flash ($0.20 vs $0.10 per second of 1080p video).
Wan 3.0Gemini Omni Flash
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 34 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Boreal, Agnes-Video-2.5, Grok Imagine Video, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash, Wan 3.0. 3 models are not plotted: Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step.

3 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Wan 3.0
    Quality
    93.1
    Rank
    #1/36
    Price
    $0.20/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Gemini Omni Flash: +0.2 quality · 2× price

  • Gemini Omni Flash
    Quality
    92.9
    Rank
    #2/36
    Price
    $0.10/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Wan 3.0: −0.2 quality · 0.5× price

Overview

Lab
Alibaba Qwen
Google DeepMind
Released
Aug 19, 2026
May 19, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
$0.20
$0.10Best

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

93.1±4.1Best
#1/36Verifiedbest value
92.9±3.7
#2/36Verifiedbest value

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—