Skip to content
Model Pareto

Wan 3.0 vs Bach 1.0 Pro

In video generation, Wan 3.0 scores 93.8 and Bach 1.0 Pro 88.7 on the 0–100 quality scale. Wan 3.0 costs 1.7× as much as Bach 1.0 Pro ($0.20 vs $0.12 per second of 1080p video).
Wan 3.0Bach 1.0 Pro
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 34 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Agnes-Video-2.5, Grok Imagine Video, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash. 4 models are not plotted: Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step.

4 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Wan 3.0
    Quality
    93.8
    Rank
    #3/36
    Price
    $0.20/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Bach 1.0 Pro: +5.1 quality · 1.7× price

  • Bach 1.0 Pro
    Quality
    88.7
    Rank
    #5/36
    Price
    $0.12/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Wan 3.0: −5.1 quality · 0.6× price

Overview

Lab
Alibaba Qwen
Video Rebirth
Released
Aug 19, 2026
Sep 29, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
$0.20
$0.12Best

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

93.8±4.1Best
#3/36Verified
88.7±7.8
#5/36Verified

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—