Skip to content
Model Pareto

Wan 2.7 0612 vs Wan 2.7

In video generation, Wan 2.7 0612 scores 60.3 and Wan 2.7 48.9 on the 0–100 quality scale. Both cost about $0.15 per second of 1080p video.
Wan 2.7 0612Wan 2.7
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 32 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Hailuo 2.3, Grok Imagine Video, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash. 4 models are not plotted: Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step.

4 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Wan 2.7 0612
    Quality
    60.3
    Rank
    #14/34
    Price
    $0.15/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Wan 2.7: +11.3 quality · 1× price

  • Wan 2.7
    Quality
    48.9
    Rank
    #18/34
    Price
    $0.15/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Wan 2.7 0612: −11.3 quality · 1× price

Overview

Lab
Alibaba Qwen
Alibaba Qwen
Released
Jun 12, 2026
Apr 25, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
$0.15Best
$0.15Best

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

60.3±6.7Best
#14/34Verified
48.9±3.2
#18/34Verified

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—