Skip to content
Model Pareto

Seedance 2.5 vs Seedance 2.0

In video generation, Seedance 2.5 scores 86.1 and Seedance 2.0 83.9 on the 0–100 quality scale. Seedance 2.5 costs 1.5× as much as Seedance 2.0 ($0.23 vs $0.15 per second of 1080p video).
Seedance 2.5Seedance 2.0
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 32 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Hailuo 2.3, Grok Imagine Video, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash. 4 models are not plotted: Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step.

4 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Seedance 2.5
    Quality
    86.1
    Rank
    #5/34
    Price
    $0.23/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Seedance 2.0: +2.2 quality · 1.5× price

  • Seedance 2.0
    Quality
    83.9
    Rank
    #7/34
    Price
    $0.15/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Seedance 2.5: −2.2 quality · 0.65× price

Overview

Lab
ByteDance Seed
ByteDance Seed
Released
Jul 31, 2026
Mar 18, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
$0.23
$0.15Best

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

86.1±6.0Best
#5/34Verified
83.9±3.0
#7/34Verified

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—