Skip to content
Model Pareto

Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5

In video generation, Seedance 2.0 scores 85.2 and Seedance 2.5 77.6 on the 0–100 quality scale. Seedance 2.5 costs 1.5× as much as Seedance 2.0 ($0.23 vs $0.15 per second of 1080p video).
Seedance 2.0Seedance 2.5
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 36 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Boreal, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite, Agnes-Video-2.5, Grok Imagine Video, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash. 4 models are not plotted: Vidu Q4 Preview, Muse Video, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step, MAGI-2 Preview.

4 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Vidu Q4 Preview, Muse Video, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step, MAGI-2 Preview

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Seedance 2.0
    Quality
    85.2
    Rank
    #6/38
    Price
    $0.15/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Seedance 2.5: +7.6 quality · 0.65× price

  • Seedance 2.5
    Quality
    77.6
    Rank
    #8/38
    Price
    $0.23/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Seedance 2.0: −7.6 quality · 1.5× price

Overview

Lab
ByteDance Seed
ByteDance Seed
Released
Mar 18, 2026
Jul 31, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
$0.15Best
$0.23

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

85.2±2.9Best
#6/38Verified
77.6±3.7
#8/38Verified

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—