Qwen-Image-3.0-Pro vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Pro
In image generation, Qwen-Image-3.0-Pro scores 54.1 and Qwen-Image-2.1-Pro 47.1 on the 0–100 quality scale. Both cost about $0.040 per image.
Qwen-Image-3.0-ProQwen-Image-2.1-Pro
Image generation: quality vs price
Compared models are ringed; the other 42 ranked here are greyed.
Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, Nano Banana 2.1, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 2 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1, Ideogram 4.5.
2 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge
Qwen-Image-2.1, Ideogram 4.5
- Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
- Evidencestrong → weak
- Estimated from other categories
- Hover a dot for details · click a lab to highlight it
- Qwen-Image-3.0-Pro
- Quality
- 54.1
- Rank
- #16/44
- Price
- $0.040/img
- Speed
- 11s
vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Pro: +7.0 quality · 1× price
- Qwen-Image-2.1-Pro
- Quality
- 47.1
- Rank
- #22/44
- Price
- $0.040/img
- Speed
- —
vs Qwen-Image-3.0-Pro: −7.0 quality · 1× price
Overview
Lab
Alibaba Qwen
Alibaba Qwen
Released
Jul 21, 2026
Oct 9, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.040Best
$0.040Best
Time per image
11s
—
Quality by category
0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.
Image generation benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
AA Text-to-Image Arena
third-party
AA Image Editing Arena
third-party
LMArena Text-to-Image
third-party
~#15/33~1227Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Image Edit
third-party
~#15/27~1366Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#16/27~1342Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
GenEval
day 0
~#3/4~86.5%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/4~85.7%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
DPG-Bench
day 0
~#3/4~87.4%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/4~87.0%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks