Skip to content
Model Pareto

Qwen-Image-3.0-Pro vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Pro

In image generation, Qwen-Image-3.0-Pro scores 54.1 and Qwen-Image-2.1-Pro 47.1 on the 0–100 quality scale. Both cost about $0.040 per image.
Qwen-Image-3.0-ProQwen-Image-2.1-Pro
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 42 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, Nano Banana 2.1, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 2 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1, Ideogram 4.5.

2 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1, Ideogram 4.5

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Qwen-Image-3.0-Pro
    Quality
    54.1
    Rank
    #16/44
    Price
    $0.040/img
    Speed
    11s

    vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Pro: +7.0 quality · 1× price

  • Qwen-Image-2.1-Pro
    Quality
    47.1
    Rank
    #22/44
    Price
    $0.040/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Qwen-Image-3.0-Pro: −7.0 quality · 1× price

Overview

Lab
Alibaba Qwen
Alibaba Qwen
Released
Jul 21, 2026
Oct 9, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.040Best
$0.040Best
Time per image
11s
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

54.1±3.5Best
#16/44Verified
47.1±5.2
#22/44Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.