Skip to content
Model Pareto

Nano Banana 2.1 vs MAI-Image-2.6

In image generation, Nano Banana 2.1 scores 77.6 and MAI-Image-2.6 75.7 on the 0–100 quality scale. MAI-Image-2.6 costs 1.2× as much as Nano Banana 2.1 ($0.039 vs $0.034 per image).
Nano Banana 2.1MAI-Image-2.6
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 42 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, Nano Banana 2.1, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 2 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1, Ideogram 4.5.

2 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1, Ideogram 4.5

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Nano Banana 2.1
    Quality
    77.6
    Rank
    #4/44
    Price
    $0.034/img
    Speed
    —

    vs MAI-Image-2.6: +1.9 quality · 0.86× price

  • MAI-Image-2.6
    Quality
    75.7
    Rank
    #5/44
    Price
    $0.039/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Nano Banana 2.1: −1.9 quality · 1.2× price

Overview

Lab
Google DeepMind
Microsoft AI
Released
Oct 6, 2026
Aug 10, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.034Best
$0.039

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

77.6±3.9Best
#4/44Verifiedbest value
75.7±3.2
#5/44Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

GenEval
day 0
~#2/4~87.9%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/4~87.7%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks