Skip to content
Model Pareto

Muse Wonder Full vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Muse Wonder Full scores higher in coding; Claude Sonnet 5.5 in hard reasoning. Muse Wonder Full has no listed API price; Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $4.00 per million tokens, blended 3:1 input:output.
Muse Wonder FullClaude Sonnet 5.5
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 131 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Nex-N2.5-Mini, Nex-N2.5-Pro, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Kimi K3.1 Pro, Claude Opus 5.5. 43 models are not plotted: Muse Wonder Full, GLM-5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark, GLM-5.3 NVFP4, Atria Dawn Preview, Ternary Bonsai 27B, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Beam 1.0 501B A23B, Qwen3.8 27B NVFP4, Maple-Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Bonsai 27B, Solar Open2 250B, Muse Spark Open, Laguna S 2.1, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Flint, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL NVFP4, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, A.X-K2, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, G9v3-39A5B, North Mini Code, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP4, LFM2.5-24B-A2B, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral 2, NVIDIA Nemotron-Labs Dory1.0 4B, MiniCPM5-2B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral Small 2, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

43 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Muse Wonder Full, GLM-5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark, GLM-5.3 NVFP4, Atria Dawn Preview, Ternary Bonsai 27B, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Beam 1.0 501B A23B, Qwen3.8 27B NVFP4, Maple-Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Bonsai 27B, Solar Open2 250B, Muse Spark Open, Laguna S 2.1, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Flint, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL NVFP4, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, A.X-K2, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, G9v3-39A5B, North Mini Code, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP4, LFM2.5-24B-A2B, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral 2, NVIDIA Nemotron-Labs Dory1.0 4B, MiniCPM5-2B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral Small 2, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Muse Wonder Full
    Quality
    91.7
    Rank
    #3/133
    Price
    —
    Speed
    —

    vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: +1.0 quality · price n/a

  • Claude Sonnet 5.5
    Quality
    90.7
    Rank
    #4/133
    Price
    $4.00/M tok
    Speed
    115tok/s
    In$2.00Out$10/M tok

    vs Muse Wonder Full: −1.0 quality · price n/a

Overview

Metric
Muse Wonder Full
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Lab
Meta
Anthropic
Released
Oct 12, 2026
Sep 28, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
—
$2.00
Output price
$/M tok
—
$10
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
—
$4.00
Output speed
tok/s
—
115
Context
tokens
1MBest
1MBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Metric
Muse Wonder Full
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Coding
91.7±4.5Best
#3/133Verified
90.7±5.3
#4/133Mixed
Vision
94.4±7.5
#2/97Verified
Not ranked
Hard reasoning
94.4±5.1
#5/213Verified
95.3±4.9Best
#3/213Verifiedbest value
Agents
99.0±4.4
#2/186Verified
Not ranked

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Muse Wonder Full
Claude Sonnet 5.5
SWE-bench Verified
day 0
~#2/20~93.9%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Muse Wonder FullEstimated93.9%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/20~94.0%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Claude Sonnet 5.5Estimated94.0%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)
day 0
~#5/23~78.6%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #4Claude Opus 579.2%
  3. ~#5Muse Wonder FullEstimated78.6%
  4. #5Intern-S2-397B68.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
#2/2281.3%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
  3. #3Claude Fable 5.181.2%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-28
DeepSWE v1.1
day 0
#2/4277.0%BestVerified
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon78.8%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 101777.0%
  3. #2Muse Wonder Full77.0%
  4. #4Muse Wonder75.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-15
#11/4271.0%Lab-reported
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon78.8%
  2. #10Muse Spark 1.371.7%
  3. #11Claude Sonnet 5.571.0%
  4. #12GPT-5.6 Terra69.6%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-28
Terminal-Bench 4.0
day 0
#5/9857.1%Verified
  1. #1Kimi K3.1 Pro67.2%
  2. #5Gemini 4 Argon57.1%
  3. #5Muse Wonder Full57.1%
  4. #7GPT-6.1 Sol56.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-13
#2/9863.6%BestVerified
  1. #1Kimi K3.1 Pro67.2%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  3. #3Claude Opus 5.559.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-28
LiveCodeBench
third-party
~#2/28~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Muse Wonder FullEstimated92.3%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/28~92.2%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Sonnet 5.5Estimated92.2%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
SciCode
third-party
#3/11762.6%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.163.1%
  3. #3Muse Wonder Full62.6%
  4. #4Gemini 4 Argon61.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-13
#5/11761.0%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #4Gemini 4 Argon61.8%
  3. #5Claude Sonnet 5.561.0%
  4. #6MiMo-V2.6-Pro60.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-28
AA Coding Agent Index
third-party
#3/2358.9Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.7
  2. #2Claude Opus 559.7
  3. #3Muse Wonder Full58.9
  4. #4Claude Fable 5.157.6
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-24
~#5/24~56.8Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.7
  2. #4Claude Fable 5.157.6
  3. ~#5Claude Sonnet 5.5Estimated56.8
  4. #5GPT-6 Sol56.7
estimated from related benchmarks
Benchmarks in other categories (3)

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Muse Wonder Full
Claude Sonnet 5.5
MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Muse Wonder FullEstimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
MMMU-Pro
day 0
~#2/88~87.6%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. ~#2Muse Wonder FullEstimated87.6%
  3. #2GPT-6 Astra86.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
CharXiv Reasoning
day 0
~#2/12~86.0%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. ~#2Muse Wonder FullEstimated86.0%
  3. #2Kimi K384.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
OmniDocBench v1.5
third-party
~#2/8~91.1%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. ~#2Muse Wonder FullEstimated91.1%
  3. #2Kimi K391.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
#1/4632.6%Verified
  1. #1Muse Wonder Full32.6%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra31.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-13
—
Chartography
third-party
~#4/24~53.6%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #3GPT-6 Sol53.6%
  3. ~#4Muse Wonder FullEstimated53.6%
  4. #4Claude Haiku 5.546.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
—

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Muse Wonder Full
Claude Sonnet 5.5
GPQA Diamond
day 0
~#2/191~96.1%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. ~#2Muse Wonder FullEstimated96.1%
  3. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/191~96.1%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Sonnet 5.5Estimated96.1%
  3. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam
day 0
#7/19753.6%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #6GPT-6 Astra54.7%
  3. #7Muse Wonder Full53.6%
  4. #8GPT-6.1 Sol52.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-13
#4/19755.0%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #3Gemini 4 Argon57.1%
  3. #4Claude Sonnet 5.555.0%
  4. #5Claude Opus 554.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-28
AIME (latest)
day 0
~#2/33~99.1%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 NVFP499.5%
  2. ~#2Muse Wonder FullEstimated99.1%
  3. #2Beam 1.0 501B A23B97.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/33~99.1%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 NVFP499.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Sonnet 5.5Estimated99.1%
  3. #2Beam 1.0 501B A23B97.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence Index
third-party
#3/10055.8Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #3Muse Wonder Full55.8
  4. #4Kimi K3.1 Pro55.1
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-13
#2/10056.0BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #3Muse Wonder Full55.8
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-28

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Muse Wonder Full
Claude Sonnet 5.5
τ²-bench (Telecom)
day 0
~#2/120~98.3%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Muse Wonder FullEstimated98.3%
  3. #2DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark98.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
OSWorld-Verified
day 0
~#2/15~84.5%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. ~#2Muse Wonder FullEstimated84.5%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
OSWorld 2.0
day 0
~#2/5~58.6%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. ~#2Muse Wonder FullEstimated58.6%
  3. #2Kimi K358.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
BrowseComp
day 0
~#2/22~92.2%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. ~#2Muse Wonder FullEstimated92.2%
  3. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
GDPval-AA (Elo)
third-party
#2/901857Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51866
  2. #2Muse Wonder Full1857
  3. #3Muse Wonder1770
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-13
—
AutomationBench-AA
third-party
#1/8371.3%Verified
  1. #1Muse Wonder Full71.3%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.569.5%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-13
—
τ-Bench Banking (AA)
third-party
~#3/91~50.0%Estimated
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
  3. ~#3Muse Wonder FullEstimated50.0%
  4. #3Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B49.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
—