Skip to content
Model Pareto

MAI-Image-2.6 vs MAI-Image-2.5

In image generation, MAI-Image-2.6 scores 75.3 and MAI-Image-2.5 60.9 on the 0–100 quality scale. MAI-Image-2.5 costs 1.2× as much as MAI-Image-2.6 ($0.048 vs $0.039 per image).
MAI-Image-2.6MAI-Image-2.5
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 36 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • MAI-Image-2.6
    Quality
    75.3
    Rank
    #4/38
    Price
    $0.039/img
    Speed
    —

    vs MAI-Image-2.5: +14.5 quality · 0.81× price

  • MAI-Image-2.5
    Quality
    60.9
    Rank
    #10/38
    Price
    $0.048/img
    Speed
    28s

    vs MAI-Image-2.6: −14.5 quality · 1.2× price

Overview

Lab
Microsoft AI
Microsoft AI
Released
Aug 10, 2026
Jun 2, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.039Best
$0.048
Time per image
—
28s

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

75.3±3.2Best
#4/38Verifiedbest value
60.9±3.2
#10/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.