Skip to content
Model Pareto

HappyHorse-1.1 vs HappyHorse-1.0

In video generation, HappyHorse-1.1 scores 66.5 and HappyHorse-1.0 65.7 on the 0–100 quality scale. HappyHorse-1.0 costs 1.3× as much as HappyHorse-1.1 ($0.22 vs $0.17 per second of 1080p video).
HappyHorse-1.1HappyHorse-1.0
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 32 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Hailuo 2.3, Grok Imagine Video, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash. 4 models are not plotted: Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step.

4 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • HappyHorse-1.1
    Quality
    66.5
    Rank
    #11/34
    Price
    $0.17/s
    Speed
    111s

    vs HappyHorse-1.0: +0.8 quality · 0.75× price

  • HappyHorse-1.0
    Quality
    65.7
    Rank
    #12/34
    Price
    $0.22/s
    Speed
    —

    vs HappyHorse-1.1: −0.8 quality · 1.3× price

Overview

Lab
Alibaba Qwen
Alibaba Qwen
Released
Jun 22, 2026
Apr 7, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
$0.17Best
$0.22
Render time
per clip
111s
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

66.5±4.1Best
#11/34Verified
65.7±3.0
#12/34Verified

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—