Skip to content
Model Pareto

GPT Image 2 vs Nano Banana 2.1

In image generation, GPT Image 2 scores 83.1 and Nano Banana 2.1 77.6 on the 0–100 quality scale. GPT Image 2 costs 6.3× as much as Nano Banana 2.1 ($0.21 vs $0.034 per image).
GPT Image 2Nano Banana 2.1
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 42 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, Nano Banana 2.1, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 2 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1, Ideogram 4.5.

2 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1, Ideogram 4.5

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • GPT Image 2
    Quality
    83.1
    Rank
    #3/44
    Price
    $0.21/img
    Speed
    118s

    vs Nano Banana 2.1: +5.5 quality · 6.3× price

  • Nano Banana 2.1
    Quality
    77.6
    Rank
    #4/44
    Price
    $0.034/img
    Speed
    —

    vs GPT Image 2: −5.5 quality · 0.16× price

Overview

Lab
OpenAI
Google DeepMind
Released
Apr 21, 2026
Oct 6, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.21
$0.034Best
Time per image
118s
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

83.1±3.2Best
#3/44Verified
77.6±3.9
#4/44Verifiedbest value

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

GenEval
day 0
~#2/4~88.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/4~87.9%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/4~88.6%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/4~88.4%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks