Skip to content
Model Pareto

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs Grok Imagine Image 2.0

In image generation, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst scores 99.5 and Grok Imagine Image 2.0 70.6 on the 0–100 quality scale. GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst costs 3.5× as much as Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ($0.21 vs $0.060 per image).
GPT Image 2.5 SunburstGrok Imagine Image 2.0
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 36 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst
    Quality
    99.5
    Rank
    #1/38
    Price
    $0.21/img
    Speed
    108s

    vs Grok Imagine Image 2.0: +28.9 quality · 3.5× price

  • Grok Imagine Image 2.0
    Quality
    70.7
    Rank
    #5/38
    Price
    $0.060/img
    Speed
    —

    vs GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst: −28.9 quality · 0.28× price

Overview

Lab
OpenAI
SpaceXAI (xAI)
Released
Sep 8, 2026
Aug 7, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.21
$0.060Best
Time per image
108s
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

99.5±1.9Best
#1/38Verifiedbest value
70.6±3.2
#5/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

GenEval
day 0
~#2/4~88.9%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/4~87.5%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks