Skip to content
Model Pareto

GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs GPT Image 2

In image generation, GPT Image 2.5 Flare scores 91.7 and GPT Image 2 82.6 on the 0–100 quality scale. Both cost about $0.21 per image.
GPT Image 2.5 FlareGPT Image 2
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 36 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • GPT Image 2.5 Flare
    Quality
    91.7
    Rank
    #2/38
    Price
    $0.21/img
    Speed
    56s

    vs GPT Image 2: +9.1 quality · 1× price

  • GPT Image 2
    Quality
    82.6
    Rank
    #3/38
    Price
    $0.21/img
    Speed
    118s

    vs GPT Image 2.5 Flare: −9.1 quality · 1× price

Overview

Lab
OpenAI
OpenAI
Released
Sep 8, 2026
Apr 21, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.21Best
$0.21
Time per image
56sBest
118s

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

91.7±3.2Best
#2/38Verified
82.6±3.2
#3/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

GenEval
day 0
~#2/4~88.6%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/4~88.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/4~88.9%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/4~88.6%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks