Skip to content
Model Pareto

GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher than GPT-6 Astra in both shared categories. GPT-6 Astra costs 5× as much as Claude Sonnet 5.5 ($20.0 vs $4.00 per million tokens, blended 3:1 input:output).
GPT-6 AstraClaude Sonnet 5.5
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 101 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 26 models are not plotted: Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

26 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • GPT-6 Astra
    Quality
    86.2
    Rank
    #4/103
    Price
    $20.0/M tok
    Speed
    52tok/s
    In$10Out$50/M tok

    vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: −5.4 quality · 5× price

  • Claude Sonnet 5.5
    Quality
    91.7
    Rank
    #2/103
    Price
    $4.00/M tok
    Speed
    —
    In$2.00▾Out$10▾/M tok

    vs GPT-6 Astra: +5.4 quality · 0.2× price

Overview

Lab
OpenAI
Anthropic
Released
Sep 3, 2026
Sep 28, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
$10
$2.00Best
Output price
$/M tok
$50
$10Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$20
$4.00Best
Output speed
tok/s
52
—
Context
tokens
1MBest
1MBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

86.2±4.5
#4/103Verified
91.7±5.2Best
#2/103Mixedbest value
92.1±5.3
#4/146Verified
Not ranked
98.9±3.0
#1/82Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
93.5±3.7
#4/182Verified
95.2±4.9Best
#3/182Verifiedbest value
81.6±4.6
#15/173Mixed
Not ranked

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~#2/14~90.0%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/14~93.8%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
LiveCodeBench
third-party
~#2/20~92.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#2/9~86.1%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#2/8~91.4%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
Chartography
third-party
—

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.