Skip to content
Model Pareto

Gemini Omni Flash vs Wan 3.0

In video generation, Gemini Omni Flash scores 96.9 and Wan 3.0 93.8 on the 0–100 quality scale. Wan 3.0 costs 2× as much as Gemini Omni Flash ($0.20 vs $0.10 per second of 1080p video).
Gemini Omni FlashWan 3.0
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 32 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Hailuo 2.3, Grok Imagine Video, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash. 4 models are not plotted: Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step.

4 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Gemini Omni Flash
    Quality
    96.9
    Rank
    #1/34
    Price
    $0.10/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Wan 3.0: +3.1 quality · 0.5× price

  • Wan 3.0
    Quality
    93.8
    Rank
    #3/34
    Price
    $0.20/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Gemini Omni Flash: −3.1 quality · 2× price

Overview

Lab
Google DeepMind
Alibaba Qwen
Released
May 19, 2026
Aug 19, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
$0.10Best
$0.20

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

96.9±3.0Best
#1/34Verifiedbest value
93.8±4.1
#3/34Verified

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—