Skip to content
Model Pareto

Bach 1.0 Pro vs Seedance 2.5

In video generation, Bach 1.0 Pro scores 88.9 and Seedance 2.5 88.2 on the 0–100 quality scale. Seedance 2.5 costs 1.9× as much as Bach 1.0 Pro ($0.23 vs $0.12 per second of 1080p video).
Bach 1.0 ProSeedance 2.5
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 34 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Boreal, Agnes-Video-2.5, Grok Imagine Video, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash, Wan 3.0. 3 models are not plotted: Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step.

3 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Bach 1.0 Pro
    Quality
    88.9
    Rank
    #4/36
    Price
    $0.12/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Seedance 2.5: +0.7 quality · 0.52× price

  • Seedance 2.5
    Quality
    88.2
    Rank
    #5/36
    Price
    $0.23/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Bach 1.0 Pro: −0.7 quality · 1.9× price

Overview

Lab
Video Rebirth
ByteDance Seed
Released
Sep 29, 2026
Jul 31, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
$0.12Best
$0.23

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

88.9±7.8Best
#4/36Verified
88.2±4.2
#5/36Verified

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—