Skip to content
Model Pareto

Bach 1.0 Pro vs HiDream-O1-Video

In video generation, Bach 1.0 Pro scores 90.9 and HiDream-O1-Video 85.6 on the 0–100 quality scale. Bach 1.0 Pro costs 1.2× as much as HiDream-O1-Video ($0.12 vs $0.097 per second of 1080p video).
Bach 1.0 ProHiDream-O1-Video
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 36 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Boreal, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite, Agnes-Video-2.5, Grok Imagine Video, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash. 4 models are not plotted: Vidu Q4 Preview, Muse Video, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step, MAGI-2 Preview.

4 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Vidu Q4 Preview, Muse Video, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step, MAGI-2 Preview

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Bach 1.0 Pro
    Quality
    90.8
    Rank
    #4/38
    Price
    $0.12/s
    Speed
    —

    vs HiDream-O1-Video: +5.2 quality · 1.2× price

  • HiDream-O1-Video
    Quality
    85.6
    Rank
    #5/38
    Price
    $0.097/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Bach 1.0 Pro: −5.2 quality · 0.81× price

Overview

Lab
Video Rebirth
HiDream.ai
Released
Sep 29, 2026
Sep 17, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
$0.12
$0.097Best

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

90.9±6.2Best
#4/38Verified
85.6±7.1
#5/38Verifiedbest value

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—